DISCLAIMER: All information represented on this page has been taken directly from verifed spam email. As spam often contains false information, company names and business addresses shown here might belong to a credible company not involved with spam or the SEO market. Use this information with the understanding that the parties mentioned may not be involved with the offense of spamming or scamming. Above all, be sure to research any company that you choose to deal with, especially if they are web-based.
The Nuisance Rating is computed using the period of time from the first and last event, the total number of events, the frequency of events in a given time period, and how recent the last event was. Higher values represent a worse rating.
Our Notes:Sent spam from a unique email address that was only provided to a large trusted organization once which was careless and let their email list get stolen. It is clear this entity is using an email list of stolen and misappropriated emails.
Most Recent Spam Email/Comment:
Return Email Address: email@example.com
From - Mon Sep 09 13:43:23 2013 Return-path: <firstname.lastname@example.org> Envelope-to: b***@*******1.com Delivery-date: Mon, 09 Sep 2013 12:41:17 -0500 Received: from [220.127.116.11] (port=33455 helo=crosslinks.score010.com) by *******.********.net with smtp (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from <email@example.com>) id 1VJ5SQ-0002nz-8R for b***@*******1.com; Mon, 09 Sep 2013 12:41:17 -0500 Received: from internal-crosslinks.score010.com by crosslinks.score010.com with ESMTPA; 9 Sep 2013 13:41:01 -0400 Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2013 13:41:01 -0400 From: "Mike Bertini" <email@example.com> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: <b***@*******1.com> Subject: Errors on your website *******1.com Content-Type: text/html Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.0 X-Spam-Score: 40 X-Spam-Bar: ++++ X-Ham-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "*******.********.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see root\@localhost for details. Content preview: Good Afternoon, My name is Mike Bertini, I was just browsing the Internet and came across your website *******1.com, which I really liked. I saw a small flaw with your website *******1.com which if corrected, should help you get more traffic from Google and all of the major search engines online. We all know how important that is today with Google coming in like the IRS and cleaning people out! (Inside joke for those who seem to get audited every year.) [...] Content analysis details: (4.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (mikebertini121[at]gmail.com) 0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED No valid author signature, adsp_override is CUSTOM_MED 0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.2 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT Envelope-from freemail username ends in digit (mikebertini121[at]gmail.com) -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.7 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts 0.8 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS 2.6 MSGID_RANDY Message-Id has pattern used in spam 0.9 NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED ADSP custom_med hit, and not from a mailing list X-Spam-Flag: NO <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd"> <html> <body> Good Afternoon,<br><br> My name is Mike Bertini, I was just browsing the Internet and came across your website *******1.com, which I really liked. <br><br> I saw a small flaw with your website *******1.com which if corrected, should help you get more traffic from Google and all of the major search engines online. We all know how important that is today with Google coming in like the IRS and cleaning people out! (Inside joke for those who seem to get audited every year.)<br><br> You have whatâ€™s called a Canonical URL issue in your website, which means that Googleâ€™s bot will see two versions of your homepage. What does that mean to you? This means that Google is dividing the authority amongst the two pages, which are actually a single page. Look, I live in Miami so you know Iâ€™m not a scammer, well at least my wife doesnâ€™t think so, but thatâ€™s another story.<br><br> Back to the topic at handâ€¦ So in effect, the power of your homepage *******1.com is being reduced by half itâ€™s authority instead of the full amount! I donâ€™t expect you to believe me, however, I would LOVE the chance to sit down and discuss it. Just to note, YES I do speak English and Iâ€™m on United States soil! (Another inside joke for business owners who get lots of telemarketing calls.)<br><br> You can learn more about this issue here : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GzA_VBHtuCk <br><br> Your web developer can easily correct this issue by making a 301 redirect, however with all do respect to them, if they were that good they would have caught this simple error a long time ago. <br><br> Another thing I noticed is some on-page issues on your website which if corrected, should help you rank better for â€œMoney Makingâ€ keyword search terms. <br><br> Let me know if you need our help to solve the canonical URL issue, and I would really like to discuss it with you on the phone. <br><br> Thanks and make sure to watch out for â€œFlying Ninjaâ€™sâ€! My son told me that this morning after watching â€œCrouching Tiger Hidden Dragonâ€ last night. <br> <br><br> Thanks & Regards, <br><br> Mike Bertini <br><br> 786-265-1536 </p> </body> </html>